SALZA REPLIES TO 1PETER5 AND JAMES BOGLE ON THE SSPX

https://youtu.be/KKPvpwFN7R4?si=L25USTZzE4ZG0nOL

This video is a rebuttal to an article by *James Bogle* published on *1Peter5*, which defended the *SSPX*. The hosts, *John Salza* and *Robert*, analyze what they describe as major theological and canonical errors in the article.

**Key topics discussed include:**

* **Critique of James Bogle's Article:** (0:00 - 5:07) The hosts introduce their rebuttal, accusing *Bogle* of incompetence, misrepresentation, and launching an "erroneous attack" against *Salza*.

* **The Heresy Concerning the Papacy:** (11:20 - 16:45) *Salza* and *Robert* document the claim that *Bogle*, along with others like *Michael Matt* and *Fr. Joseph Wilson*, denies the defined dogma that the *Pope* is the head of the *Catholic Church*. The hosts argue that the *institutional Church* is the true *Catholic Church*.

* **Supplied Jurisdiction and Sacraments:** (32:00 - 41:40) The hosts discuss the status of *SSPX* faculties, arguing that their previous confessions were invalid for decades and challenging *Bogle's* interpretation of *Pope Francis's* grants of authority.

* **Bishop Fellay and Canonical Trials:** (46:02 - 50:30) The hosts address a claim regarding *Bishop Fellay* acting as a judge in a canonical trial, clarifying that this does not constitute validation of *SSPX* marriages.

* **Rejection of the Profession of Faith:** (58:05 - 1:04:08) The hosts argue that the *SSPX* rejects the *1989 Profession of Faith* and explain why they believe this indicates a rejection of *Catholic* teaching.

* **State of Necessity and Epikeia:** (1:11:11 - 1:18:40) The hosts criticize *Bogle's* application of the principle of *epikeia* to justify *SSPX* episcopal consecrations, maintaining that necessity does not supply mission.

* **Communion in the Hand:** (1:29:05 - 1:31:07) The video concludes with a brief discussion challenging the claim that communion in the hand is a modern novelty, citing early church history.

Lefebvre: Marks of the Church only with SSPX, not with others

Lefebvre: Marks of the Church only with SSPX, not with others "Where is the visible Church? The visible Church is recognized by the signs that she has always given for her visibility: she is One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic. (…) where are the true marks of the Church? Are they more in the official Church (it is not the visible Church, it is the official Church) or with us, in what we represent, what we are? If there is still any visibility of the Church today, it is thanks to you. These signs are no longer found in others. There is no longer any unity of faith among them, yet it is faith that is the basis of all visibility of the Church. Catholicity is one faith in space. Apostolicity is one faith in time and holiness is the fruit of faith, which materializes in souls by the grace of God, by the grace of the sacraments. It is quite wrong to consider ourselves as if we were not part of the visible Church. […] is to make a mistake in equating the official Church with th...

As a dog that returneth to his vomit, so is the fool that repeateth his folly: The folly of the Transalpine Redemptorists

As a dog that returneth to his vomit, so is the fool that repeateth his folly. -Proverbs 26:11, DRB Let's start off with what was publicly stated by the Transalpine Redemptorists in 2008. Read how important undisputed communion with Rome is for them... back in 2008. Tuesday, July 01, 2008 Canonical Good Standing 1 July, 2008 Feast of the Precious Blood My dear friends, I am happy to inform you that last June 18th, before Cardinal Castrillon and the members of the Pontifical Commission Ecclesia Dei in Rome, I humbly petitioned the Holy See on my own behalf and on behalf of the monastery council for our priestly suspensions to be lifted. On June 26th I received word that the Holy See had granted our petition. All canonical censures have been lifted. Our community now truly rejoices in undisputed and peaceful posession of Communion with the Holy See because our priests are now in canonical good standing. We are very grateful to our Holy Father Pope Benedict XVI for issuing, last July,...

Fr. Brian Harrison, OS, MA, STD on the Status of the SSPX

Father Brian Harrison, OS, MA, STD on The Journey Home (EWTN) Editor, L. Gonzaga: With permission, I publish here a private group message written by Fr. Brian Harrison, OS, MA, STD addressed to two SSPX priests, whom I am not naming as their emails have not been approved for publication. This message was in support of an initial case made by Dr. Robert Sungenis on the status of the SSPX. On Fri, Sep 12, 2025, 5:55 PM Brian Harrison wrote: If I may be permitted to weigh in here: Dr. Sungenis is right. Pope Benedict XVI, even when lifting the 1988 excommunications on the SSPX bishops in 2009, said (via the Prefect of the Congregation for Bishops), that the Society was not "in full communion" with the Catholic Church, and that he hoped this gesture would be a step towards bringing them back into full communion. As is well known, "not in full communion" with the Catholic Church is just the polite, ecumenically-oriented post-Vatican II term for being in schism ...

SSPX Schism

Search This Blog