SSPX Schism

I don't know much about FrDave Nix. I never heard of him before Mass of the Ages. I'm sure he's a smart and generally doctrinally sound priest. I don't watch or listen to his content. Someone informed me that he has weighed in on the John Salza Pints with Aquinas (Matt Fradd) interview calling it "silly". I checked the post and commented. He sounds like he is a schismatic in training, if not already one himself. I wouldn't follow this blind "leader" into schism any more than the blind leaders who stay within the Catholic Communion. They are wrong for different reasons which is a distinction that emotion based Trads have a hard time making. Lesser of two evils won't work for you here because the perceived lesser of two evils here, participation in, support of, promotion of the SSPX and all similar setups, takes you out of the Catholic Church and into a schismatic "church".  There's only one Cat

Lefebvre: Marks of the Church only with SSPX, not with others "Where is the visible Church? The visible Church is recognized by the signs that she has always given for her visibility: she is One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic. (…) where are the true marks of the Church? Are they more in the official Church (it is not the visible Church, it is the official Church) or with us, in what we represent, what we are? If there is still any visibility of the Church today, it is thanks to you. These signs are no longer found in others. There is no longer any unity of faith among them, yet it is faith that is the basis of all visibility of the Church. Catholicity is one faith in space. Apostolicity is one faith in time and holiness is the fruit of faith, which materializes in souls by the grace of God, by the grace of the sacraments. It is quite wrong to consider ourselves as if we were not part of the visible Church. […] is to make a mistake in equating the official Church with th

Dan Kavic to talk about his journey through the SSPX and Sedevacantism. SSPX a cult?