Skip to main content

Schismatics, the SSPX, and Sedes w/ John Salza (Pints with Aquinas)

Schismatics, the SSPX, and Sedes w/ John Salza

 

  1. Didn’t Francis give the SSPX faculties for confession?

  2. SSPX priests name Francis in the Mass

  3. State of Necessity

  4. Canon 1323 and Archb. Lefebvre

  5. Lifting of the Excommunications

  6. Fulton Sheen and the SSPX

  7. Novus Ordo Priest discouraging going to FSSP in schism?

  8. Isn’t the Novus Ordo an offense to God?

  9. No TLM without SSPX and Lefebvre

  10. Wasn’t Rome toying with Lefebvre and so his actions were necessary

  11. Are you saying not to go to TLM and go to a clown Mass?

  12. The marriage issue in the SSPX and the schismatic tribunal erected by the SSPX

  13. Canon law, in brief

  14. Is Francis the true pope? Universal and peaceful acceptance

  15. Formal, Material, Occult Heresy and Schism

  16. The Benevacantist arguments

  17. Great Western Schism, confusion in good faith

  18. Francis, a bad pope

  19. Covid and Trads leaving to join schismatic and heretical groups, sedevacantists

  20. Mainstream Trads calling people “enemies of the Church”

  21. Heretical post-conciliar popes St. Robert Bellarmine

  22. JP II Kissing the Koran

  23. Pachamama and Francis

  24. Assisi 1986 and JPII

  25. John XXIII a Freemason

  26. Those outside the Church cannot govern those inside the Church

  27. The Great Apostasy

  28. La Salette, Rome will lose the faith and the seat of Antichrist

Popular posts from this blog

As a dog that returneth to his vomit, so is the fool that repeateth his folly: The folly of the Transalpine Redemptorists

As a dog that returneth to his vomit, so is the fool that repeateth his folly. -Proverbs 26:11, DRB Let's start off with what was publicly stated by the Transalpine Redemptorists in 2008. Read how important undisputed communion with Rome is for them... back in 2008. Tuesday, July 01, 2008 Canonical Good Standing 1 July, 2008 Feast of the Precious Blood My dear friends, I am happy to inform you that last June 18th, before Cardinal Castrillon and the members of the Pontifical Commission Ecclesia Dei in Rome, I humbly petitioned the Holy See on my own behalf and on behalf of the monastery council for our priestly suspensions to be lifted. On June 26th I received word that the Holy See had granted our petition. All canonical censures have been lifted. Our community now truly rejoices in undisputed and peaceful posession of Communion with the Holy See because our priests are now in canonical good standing. We are very grateful to our Holy Father Pope Benedict XVI for issuing, last July,...
Read more

Fr. Brian Harrison, OS, MA, STD on the Status of the SSPX

Father Brian Harrison, OS, MA, STD on The Journey Home (EWTN) Editor, L. Gonzaga: With permission, I publish here a private group message written by Fr. Brian Harrison, OS, MA, STD addressed to two SSPX priests, whom I am not naming as their emails have not been approved for publication. This message was in support of an initial case made by Dr. Robert Sungenis on the status of the SSPX. On Fri, Sep 12, 2025, 5:55 PM Brian Harrison wrote: If I may be permitted to weigh in here:   Dr. Sungenis is right.  Pope Benedict XVI, even when lifting the 1988 excommunications on the SSPX bishops in 2009, said (via the Prefect of the Congregation for Bishops), that the Society was not "in full communion" with the Catholic Church, and that he hoped this gesture would be a step towards bringing them back into full communion.    As is well known, "not in full communion" with the Catholic Church is just the polite, ecumenically-oriented post-Vatican II term for being in schism ...
Read more

SSPX Masses and the Sunday Obligation by John Salza

In the span of just a few days, two well-known Catholics publicly gave what I maintain are erroneous conclusions regarding whether or not SSPX Masses fulfill the Sunday obligation. On September 18, 2024, in an interview with Gene Zannetti, Fr. Chad Ripperger stated that SSPX Masses fulfill the obligation. And on September 21, 2024, in an article by Daniel Payne for Catholic News Agency (about the Carmelite nuns who defected to the SSPX), Jimmy Akin of Catholic Answers is also quoted as suggesting that SSPX Masses fulfill the obligation (because he says Catholics can attend their Masses and receive Holy Communion). As I will demonstrate in this article, both statements fall short of a proper understanding of canon law, which lead to the erroneous conclusion. Note that I already addressed this issue at length in my November 2021 article “Do SSPX Masses Fulfill the Sunday Obligation?” (this previous article also analyzes all the negative judgments by the Holy See regarding SS...
Read more